Radiologist report of MRI states
"There are at least three frontal small subcortical nonenhancing white matter lesions, would be consistent with a reported history of multiple sclerosis".
My neurologist told me after my MRI that there was nonspecific white matter and that's it. He did a LP and told me all was well.
He then said I needed to go to a secondary facility and recommended John Hopkins. Before JH can get me an appointment, they need all my med records, so I went to the imaging center to get the radiologist report for the MRI that is when I saw what I wrote in the beginning.
Basically I'm just confused. Does my neurologist have a different opinion than the radiologist or is he maybe just not comfortable making any type of diagnosis, hence why he's sending me to JH?
"There are at least three frontal small subcortical nonenhancing white matter lesions, would be consistent with a reported history of multiple sclerosis".
My neurologist told me after my MRI that there was nonspecific white matter and that's it. He did a LP and told me all was well.
He then said I needed to go to a secondary facility and recommended John Hopkins. Before JH can get me an appointment, they need all my med records, so I went to the imaging center to get the radiologist report for the MRI that is when I saw what I wrote in the beginning.
Basically I'm just confused. Does my neurologist have a different opinion than the radiologist or is he maybe just not comfortable making any type of diagnosis, hence why he's sending me to JH?
Comment