I'm curious to know what you guys think, being patients of this disease for awhile. This is an email I sent to her after I saw her to make sure I understood her correctly. My continuation is added so it looks like one email here:
From: (last name deleted),JAMI (middle initial deleted)
Sent: 12/12/2016 1:23 PM PST
To:
Subject: Hi
Hi Dr, thank you again for seeing me today. I wish appointments could be made for two hours because there was so much more I wanted to tell you about symptoms history. Anyway, I want to make sure I understood you correctly about what the plan is. I will send you a new email when I run out of room, but I'll try to keep it short.
1. It could be MS and Fibro.
2. It could be Fibro and under-treated anxiety; 9 brain lesions being caused by migraines (do the fleeting stabs of pain in my forehead and shooting pain through my face sound like migraines to you?--I don't know what to call that, that's why I'm asking you).
3. As an aside, but still related, the attack in 2010 could be CIS and since MRI technology wasn't as good then, the spinal cord lesion could've been missed. Doctors don't know who will go on to develop the disease of MS so it's just monitored with MRI.
4. I need to do the lumbar puncture to get some answers because right now we are just going in circles.
5. If it's MS, it will definitely show up on the lumbar puncture because it has been almost 7 years. If it's not, it will be Fibro and there is help for that. Or, it could be something totally different.
6. There are no alternative tests to do aside from the lumbar puncture other than the MRIs and blood work I've already had, because I've had every test.
7. If the lumbar puncture is positive, don't worry because I'm in great shape compared to what is typically seen this far out.
8. Right now, I don't meet the criteria for a MS diagnosis because the lesions aren't in MS specific locations other than the juxtacortical and periventricular, they aren't ovoid shaped, and they aren't large enough, but it still could be CIS because the spinal cord lesion was probably missed in 2010 due to the MRI machines being used then.
Please let me know if I have understood what you said because I'm having trouble putting it chronologically.
________________
Here was her reply:
To:
Jami (middle and last name deleted)
From:
Received:
12/15/2016 3:29 PM PST
Hi Jami
It was a pleasure meeting you
Yes you have summarized our conversation very accurately in the 2 emails
Please do go through with the LP
Best wishes
Dr.
***Moderator's Note - Physician's name deleted for privacy issue***
________________________
From: (last name deleted),JAMI (middle initial deleted)
Sent: 12/12/2016 1:23 PM PST
To:
Subject: Hi
Hi Dr, thank you again for seeing me today. I wish appointments could be made for two hours because there was so much more I wanted to tell you about symptoms history. Anyway, I want to make sure I understood you correctly about what the plan is. I will send you a new email when I run out of room, but I'll try to keep it short.
1. It could be MS and Fibro.
2. It could be Fibro and under-treated anxiety; 9 brain lesions being caused by migraines (do the fleeting stabs of pain in my forehead and shooting pain through my face sound like migraines to you?--I don't know what to call that, that's why I'm asking you).
3. As an aside, but still related, the attack in 2010 could be CIS and since MRI technology wasn't as good then, the spinal cord lesion could've been missed. Doctors don't know who will go on to develop the disease of MS so it's just monitored with MRI.
4. I need to do the lumbar puncture to get some answers because right now we are just going in circles.
5. If it's MS, it will definitely show up on the lumbar puncture because it has been almost 7 years. If it's not, it will be Fibro and there is help for that. Or, it could be something totally different.
6. There are no alternative tests to do aside from the lumbar puncture other than the MRIs and blood work I've already had, because I've had every test.
7. If the lumbar puncture is positive, don't worry because I'm in great shape compared to what is typically seen this far out.
8. Right now, I don't meet the criteria for a MS diagnosis because the lesions aren't in MS specific locations other than the juxtacortical and periventricular, they aren't ovoid shaped, and they aren't large enough, but it still could be CIS because the spinal cord lesion was probably missed in 2010 due to the MRI machines being used then.
Please let me know if I have understood what you said because I'm having trouble putting it chronologically.
________________
Here was her reply:
To:
Jami (middle and last name deleted)
From:
Received:
12/15/2016 3:29 PM PST
Hi Jami
It was a pleasure meeting you
Yes you have summarized our conversation very accurately in the 2 emails
Please do go through with the LP
Best wishes
Dr.
***Moderator's Note - Physician's name deleted for privacy issue***
________________________
Comment