My latest mri report noted "Some of these lesions are again noted to exhibit mild contrast enhancement...." So I emailed my neuro to ask if that meant I needed steroids. She said something like it wasn't lesions that were enhancing bc lesions don't enhance that long - which is what I thought. So the radiologist was wrong? Maybe I have an area of persistent break in the blood brain barrier.
It also noted evidence of either calcification or blood products, which I think is a normal aging process that we get prematurely.
I'll ask my neuro for more explanation on the 21st but was wondering about these "again seen 5 - 10 areas of nodular enhancement...., appreciated only on postcontrast images". Seems like nodes and lesions are used interchangeably so these particular lesions may not refer to ms lesions?
It also noted evidence of either calcification or blood products, which I think is a normal aging process that we get prematurely.
I'll ask my neuro for more explanation on the 21st but was wondering about these "again seen 5 - 10 areas of nodular enhancement...., appreciated only on postcontrast images". Seems like nodes and lesions are used interchangeably so these particular lesions may not refer to ms lesions?
Comment