I have a question and I have done research on it but I am still very confused and was hoping someone here could explain it to me please.
I have 8 lesions one is in c spine and other 7 in brain. My mri report states that 2 of the lesions are "most likely in a sub-acute phase" also stated is that of the 8 lesions the largest measures 7 mm.
What I am finding confusing is that it sounds like a sub-acute phase is when your body is regenerating and trying to heal itself but if so then why is it explained as a negative thing happening?
Also, I read that 80% of lesions are between 7-10 mm and the larger they are the better that is. I am not understanding why having smaller lesions would be a more harmful then to having larger lesions. From what I am understanding lesions will also shrink over time.
I hope that any of this makes sense to someone I am so confused I am not even sure if I am getting across what I am trying to ask lol.
I have 8 lesions one is in c spine and other 7 in brain. My mri report states that 2 of the lesions are "most likely in a sub-acute phase" also stated is that of the 8 lesions the largest measures 7 mm.
What I am finding confusing is that it sounds like a sub-acute phase is when your body is regenerating and trying to heal itself but if so then why is it explained as a negative thing happening?
Also, I read that 80% of lesions are between 7-10 mm and the larger they are the better that is. I am not understanding why having smaller lesions would be a more harmful then to having larger lesions. From what I am understanding lesions will also shrink over time.
I hope that any of this makes sense to someone I am so confused I am not even sure if I am getting across what I am trying to ask lol.
Comment