So I have been spending time looking at stuff online today… ( bad I know) but I am still really confused with the stuff I am reading.
A diagnosis needs no additional data if a person presents with the following symptoms:
The only one of these I have is the second one. I cannot think of any other flares besides the double vision and I have my MRI report practically memorized. There is nothing at all in there about evidence of a previous flare. What would reasonable evidence of a previous flare even include?
The criteria for establishing dissemination in time include discovering:
Again this is not something I had on either of my MRI reports. I just reread them just to make sure I am not crazy, but there was nothing about either of those things. I guess I am just really confused about how with only one symptom I can be told you have this and there is no chance it could be anything else.
I know I did read that enhancing lesions are **usually** newer but sometimes old ones can act up again so it is not 100% to always say that one that enhances is new.
Sorry for the rambling I am just really getting anxious about seeing my new neurologist and more and more frustrated about how my old one treated me. I basically feel like the past year has been “wasted” since everything I know about this disease I have learned from the internet and I am sick of getting my hopes up that it is going to be something else.
A diagnosis needs no additional data if a person presents with the following symptoms:
- two or more attacks of MS symptoms
- evidence of two or more lesions on the brain and spinal cord or central nervous system
- reasonable evidence of a previous MS flare
The only one of these I have is the second one. I cannot think of any other flares besides the double vision and I have my MRI report practically memorized. There is nothing at all in there about evidence of a previous flare. What would reasonable evidence of a previous flare even include?
The criteria for establishing dissemination in time include discovering:
- any new bright lesion on the central nervous system that did not appear on the last MRI scan
- an asymptomatic contrast-enhancing lesion and a non-contrast-enhancing T2 bright lesion on any one scan
Again this is not something I had on either of my MRI reports. I just reread them just to make sure I am not crazy, but there was nothing about either of those things. I guess I am just really confused about how with only one symptom I can be told you have this and there is no chance it could be anything else.
I know I did read that enhancing lesions are **usually** newer but sometimes old ones can act up again so it is not 100% to always say that one that enhances is new.
Sorry for the rambling I am just really getting anxious about seeing my new neurologist and more and more frustrated about how my old one treated me. I basically feel like the past year has been “wasted” since everything I know about this disease I have learned from the internet and I am sick of getting my hopes up that it is going to be something else.
Comment