Was granted a 30% SC disability for MS. However, the C&P exam used the incorrect DBQ. They used the DBQ for CNS and not the one for MS. As a result, when the NP checked the box for bladder urgency or right leg atrophy, the CNS DBQ stopped there. With the MS DBQ, it would state "as a result of MS".
At the exam, the NP checked bladder urgency, right leg weakness, atrophy, gait, permanent numbness, cognative issues to name a few.
What do you think is the next step? A NOD? My Service officer at the DAV filed an intent to file a claim. He said this is probably the best way to go about this.
My civilian Neurologist as well as the VSO both agree that 30% is too low.
Wanting to get opinions on the next step.
Thanks
At the exam, the NP checked bladder urgency, right leg weakness, atrophy, gait, permanent numbness, cognative issues to name a few.
What do you think is the next step? A NOD? My Service officer at the DAV filed an intent to file a claim. He said this is probably the best way to go about this.
My civilian Neurologist as well as the VSO both agree that 30% is too low.
Wanting to get opinions on the next step.
Thanks
Comment