Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How many brain lesions on average do we have?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Addendum

    Just to follow up, what I described are two separate phenomena. For lesion counting, the use of thin sections probably increases your count, only because you will likely see the same lesion on two slices if they're thin enough. Since more and more patients seem to be seeking out 3 tesla scanners - which may use thinner sections - the problem is only getting worse.

    Patial volume averaging is more likely to obscure the presence of a small lesion, and this is where thin sections are helpful.


    rex

    Comment


      #17
      I wasn't given a count, just a description of extensive damage from ms with confluent lesion and ring enhancing lesion. from what i understand confluent means they have meshed together and ring enhancing means they are forming on top of each other?

      2 on the spine at last mri, 4.

      from what i am understanding, a high lesion count doesn't predict disability, it just makes you believed when you complain about anything...so a person has to be very careful about complaining about anything...can't be certain what actions will be taken.
      xxxxxxxxxxx

      Comment


        #18
        Confluent does mean that the lesions are closely associated, but ring-enhancing refers to their appearance on the post-gadolinium sequences - the lesion shows contrast enhancement around its periphery (edge), so the enhanced portion is like a ring around it:

        http://images.radiopaedia.org/images...6acb718e9d.jpg


        rex

        Comment


          #19
          You might be interested in this site, if you scroll down the page

          it has a section on normal aging white matter changes with the Fazekas scale.

          Fazekas I &II can be considered normal in aging,

          Fazekas III(extensive confluent lesions) is never considered normal.

          http://www.radiologyassistant.nl<br ...p4594f74ccbf19

          always makes me wonder how many are from MS and how many are from other things? the longer a person lives the more other things it could be.

          i was 41 at the time of the MRI. maybe 59% are from ms and 41% are from other things:stress, the 4 years i smoked, some headaches. i have always had low bp, so i don't think any are vascular. i didn't drink excessively(maybe a few times a decade after i turned 16), i only started a med 7 years ago, before that i didn't use any prescription or non prescription drugs, ice cream is/was my drug of choice.( i don't think that causes lesion, but if i drank or used any drugs that could have caused a % of those lesions)
          xxxxxxxxxxx

          Comment


            #20
            MS LESIONS GOING FROM WHITE TO BLACK

            SO WE WENT TO THE DR AND MY HUSBANDS LESIONS WENT FROM WHITE TO BLACK. 5 DRS HAVE LOOKED AT HIS MRI'S AND HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HAPPEN BEFORE! ANY OTHER PEOPLE HAVE THIS PROBLEM?????

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by 0485c10 View Post
              ...always makes me wonder how many are from MS and how many are from other things? the longer a person lives the more other things it could be.

              i was 41 at the time of the MRI. maybe 59% are from ms and 41% are from other things:stress, the 4 years i smoked, some headaches. i have always had low bp, so i don't think any are vascular. i didn't drink excessively(maybe a few times a decade after i turned 16), i only started a med 7 years ago, before that i didn't use any prescription or non prescription drugs, ice cream is/was my drug of choice.( i don't think that causes lesion, but if i drank or used any drugs that could have caused a % of those lesions)
              I've been doing MRI for 27 years now...to be honest, MS plaques tend to have a unique appearance, relative to other "bright spots" in the brain, which used to be called UBOs - Unidentified Bright Objects. Bright spots on T2-weighted images tend to be either demyelinating disease (MS is one), cerebrovascular disease (stroke), migraine-related, tumor or simply dialated perivascular spaces. FLAIR is helpful in that it surpresses the signal from CSF and eliminates the imaging of the perivascular spaces (called Virchow-Robbins spaces). But to the trained eye, MS plaques are usually different and tend to stand out. The others are normally mentioned as possible, differential diagnoses.

              Taking drugs or drinking alcohol doesn't mean that you have brain lesions. Exposure to some chemicals or chemical fumes can definitely affect the brain, but the appearance is usually strikingly bad.


              rex

              Comment


                #22
                REX,
                This is great to have a radiologist on the message board!

                Thank you for your comment. Still a little too technical for me
                but I am understanding better now.But yes it is the radiologist that counted those lesions, probably on the MS neuro order because he sent me to him.

                Here is the copy of the result:
                If you feel like it, please comment.

                Thank you,
                Alain

                FINDINGS:
                T2 lesions: Comparison was made predominantly to the study performed on 2009. Multiple some of them too small to count approximately 50 to 70
                T2 lesions some of them located in the periventricular white matter and corpus callosum and most of them in the subcortical and centrum semiovale white matter of the frontoparietal lobes, some of the lesions may be
                related to superimposed chronic small vessel ischemic changes.
                A discrete lesion is also seen in the right central cerebellar hemisphere and left posterolateral pontobulbar junction. The lesions size range between 2 and 11 mm, the largest lesion in the left frontal centrum semiovale white matter. There are approximately 7 to 10 new T2 lesions.


                T1 "black holes": There are two unchanged periventricular white matter
                black holes adjacent to the body of the lateral ventricles.

                Enhancing lesions: None

                Corpus callosum vol.: Within normal limits

                Brain volume: Within normal limits for age, unchanged.

                Other: Minimal mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinuses.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by kingrex View Post
                  But to the trained eye, MS plaques are usually different and tend to stand out.

                  Taking drugs or drinking alcohol doesn't mean that you have brain lesions. Exposure to some chemicals or chemical fumes can definitely affect the brain, but the appearance is usually strikingly bad.
                  usually, huh? i have read an MRI is nothing more than a picture of the brain that is interpreted, that the definite answer can only come from biopsy or autopsy? in 27 years you have seen the resolution on the pictures getting much better, but i believe biopsy to autopsy trumps an interpretation. are you copied on biopsy and autopsy reports of any past MRI you have done, to read how close your interpretations were?
                  xxxxxxxxxxx

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by kingrex View Post
                    FLAIR is helpful in that it surpresses the signal from CSF and eliminates the imaging of the perivascular spaces (called Virchow-Robbins spaces).
                    its interesting that flair takes out signals from vascular issues. i thought it showed more and more noise. but they aren't vascular noise? i have to remeber the order of this. black holes show black on a t1 mri
                    black holes show white on a t2 mri
                    and black holes show black on a flair mri.

                    right or do i have it wrong?(asking to be certain question mark, checking consistency of how cerebral fluid shows on different mri, not demanding/telling question mark)
                    xxxxxxxxxxx

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by 0485c10 View Post
                      usually, huh? i have read an MRI is nothing more than a picture of the brain that is interpreted, that the definite answer can only come from biopsy or autopsy? in 27 years you have seen the resolution on the pictures getting much better, but i believe biopsy to autopsy trumps an interpretation. are you copied on biopsy and autopsy reports of any past MRI you have done, to read how close your interpretations were?
                      I'm not sure what definite answer you're referring to. What I meant by "strikingly bad" was that toxic exposure usually produces a dramatic appearance on MRI...more than little white dots. As for MRI's specificity, which I think you're questioning by your biopsy/autopsy references, I'd agree that MRI images, in the absence of any other clinical or imaging data, probably lack complete specificity, although 30 years of imaging experience has given radiologists a lot to go on, and surgeons are largely comfortable operating based upon MRI findings. But you're right - nothing is quite like firsthand contact with the tissue.

                      BTW - I don't interpret MRIs, radiologists do. I'm a technologist.


                      rex

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by 0485c10 View Post
                        its interesting that flair takes out signals from vascular issues. i thought it showed more and more noise. but they aren't vascular noise? i have to remeber the order of this. black holes show black on a t1 mri
                        black holes show white on a t2 mri
                        and black holes show black on a flair mri.

                        right or do i have it wrong?(asking to be certain question mark, checking consistency of how cerebral fluid shows on different mri, not demanding/telling question mark)
                        I'm not clear on what you mean by "vascular noise," but perhaps you mean the flow artifacts caused by blood moving through the vessels during imaging? In any case, what I said was that FLAIR eliminates bright areas from the CSF surrounding vascular structures in the brain, but it does not eliminate our view of the brain's vasculature.

                        Black holes do show dark on T1-weighted images, but not necessarily on FLAIR. In any case, T1-weighted imaging is what's used to look for black holes, as well as for post-gadolinium imaging.


                        rex

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by penkalet View Post
                          REX,
                          This is great to have a radiologist on the message board!
                          Technologist, not radiologist. But thanks.


                          rex

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by kingrex View Post
                            In any case, T1-weighted imaging is what's used to look for black holes, as well as for post-gadolinium imaging.
                            i thought a loss of brain tissue black hole lesions had to have a corresponding white lesion on a t2 mri or the black spot on the t1 image with gadolinium could be something else?



                            Originally posted by kingrex View Post
                            Technologist, not radiologist.
                            i knew but glad you stated it definitively. Mostly only technologist state things with any certainty. those working at a level above always leave a door open for other conclusions as new evidence evolves. if a person is looking for certainty, stick with a technologist!
                            xxxxxxxxxxx

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by 0485c10 View Post
                              i thought a loss of brain tissue black hole lesions had to have a corresponding white lesion on a t2 mri or the black spot on the t1 image with gadolinium could be something else?

                              That's right. I didn't think I said anything different.

                              Regarding your comments about radiologists and technologists - you haven't got it exactly right. Technologists understand the technology and we understand what we see, but we don't offer official interpretations to anyone, nor do we even offer confidential, off-the-record opinions. As for the radiologists' reluctance to state things with absolute certainty, it's not about leaving doors open - it's about not being sued by patients who don't understand that radiology is part science and part art, as all diagnostic medicine is.


                              rex

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Rex and 04,

                                Thank you very much for all the explanations!

                                Just got an MRI education and it was fun!!.

                                Alain

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X